Stem Innovation – ‘IZON’ Hard-Coded Credentials

  • 作者: Mark Stanislav
    日期: 2013-10-29
  • 类别:
    平台:
  • 来源:https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/29266/
  • Stem Innovation ‘IZON’ Hard-coded Credentials (CVE-2013-6236)
    Mark Stanislav - mstanislav@duosecurity.com
    
    
    I. DESCRIPTION
    ---------------------------------------
    Stem Innovation's IP camera called ‘IZON’ utilizes numerous hard-coded credentials within its Linux distribution and also the hidden web application running on the camera. These sets of credentials are never exposed to the end-user and cannot be changed through any normal operation of the camera. Further, using the web interface credentials will provide access to a camera stream and configuration details, including third-party API keys.
    
    
    II. TESTED VERSION
    ---------------------------------------
    iOS Mobile Application: 1.0.5
    Camera Firmware: 2.0.2
    
    
    III. PoC EXPLOIT
    ---------------------------------------
    1) Telnet Credentials
    * "root" with a password of "stemroot"
    * "admin" with a password of "/ADMIN/"
    * "mg3500" with a password of "merlin"
    
    2) HTTP Credentials (http://camera-ip/mobileye/)
    * "user" with a password of "user"
    
    
    IV. SOLUTION
    ---------------------------------------
    Update to the latest firmware and hope for the best.
    
    
    V. REFERENCES
    ---------------------------------------
    https://blog.duosecurity.com/2013/10/izon-ip-camera-hardcoded-passwords-and-unencrypted-data-abound/
    https://securityledger.com/2013/10/apple-store-favorite-izon-cameras-riddled-with-security-holes/
    http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2013-6236
    
    
    VI. TIMELINE
    ---------------------------------------
    09/06/2013 - Initial vendor contact stating I wanted to discuss a variety of security issues
    09/06/2013 - Vendor’s help desk responded and asked for clarification about my request
    09/06/2013 - Responded to the vendor’s help desk and reaffirmed my purpose for contact
    09/16/2013 - Updated my existing help desk ticket after not hearing back in 10 days
    09/19/2013 - Received a response back to contact their CEO directly about these issues
    09/19/2013 - E-mailed the vendor’s CEO with synopsis details and severity ratings for the key issues
    09/30/2013 - I opened up a new help desk ticket to follow-up after not hearing from their CEO after 11 days
    10/01/2013 - The new case was updated saying that their CEO was aware of my email and would respond
    10/03/2013 - I received a follow-up from their CTO with no specific details about plans to fix issues
    10/03/2013 - Followed-up with the CTO to ask for specific details about the issues I had found
    10/14/2013 - CTO responded asking to “meet” to discuss my findings but again offered no details
    10/14/2013 - Offered up time ranges for the next day that were viable to discuss my findings
    10/17/2013 - Public presentation of camera research which included these issues
    10/28/2013 - Still no response from vendor on confirmation of fixes or a timeline to do so