扫码分享
验证：
体验盒子Source: https://code.google.com/p/google-security-research/issues/detail?id=612
The following crash was encountered in pdfium (the Chrome PDF renderer) during PDF fuzzing:
--- cut ---
$ ./pdfium_test asan_stack-oob_b9a750_1372_52559cc9c86b4bc0fb43218c7f69c5c8
Rendering PDF file asan_stack-oob_b9a750_1372_52559cc9c86b4bc0fb43218c7f69c5c8.
Non-linearized path...
=================================================================
==22207==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7ffc8b7edb84 at pc 0x000000d6f064 bp 0x7ffc8b7ed8c0 sp 0x7ffc8b7ed8b8
READ of size 4 at 0x7ffc8b7edb84 thread T0
#0 0xd6f063 in CPDF_Function::Call(float*, int, float*, int&) const core/src/fpdfapi/fpdf_page/fpdf_page_func.cpp:896:9
#1 0xd6ecd2 in CPDF_StitchFunc::v_Call(float*, float*) const core/src/fpdfapi/fpdf_page/fpdf_page_func.cpp:808:3
#2 0xd6f6a7 in CPDF_Function::Call(float*, int, float*, int&) const core/src/fpdfapi/fpdf_page/fpdf_page_func.cpp:902:3
#3 0xedbc22 in DrawFuncShading(CFX_DIBitmap*, CFX_Matrix*, CPDF_Dictionary*, CPDF_Function**, int, CPDF_ColorSpace*, int) core/src/fpdfapi/fpdf_render/fpdf_render_pattern.cpp:293:15
#4 0xeda3c0 in CPDF_RenderStatus::DrawShading(CPDF_ShadingPattern*, CFX_Matrix*, FX_RECT&, int, int) core/src/fpdfapi/fpdf_render/fpdf_render_pattern.cpp:875:7
#5 0xee45b9 in CPDF_RenderStatus::ProcessShading(CPDF_ShadingObject*, CFX_Matrix const*) core/src/fpdfapi/fpdf_render/fpdf_render_pattern.cpp:954:3
#6 0xe6700d in CPDF_RenderStatus::ProcessObjectNoClip(CPDF_PageObject const*, CFX_Matrix const*) core/src/fpdfapi/fpdf_render/fpdf_render.cpp:399:14
#7 0xe61f6d in CPDF_RenderStatus::RenderSingleObject(CPDF_PageObject const*, CFX_Matrix const*) core/src/fpdfapi/fpdf_render/fpdf_render.cpp:292:3
#8 0xe618c1 in CPDF_RenderStatus::RenderObjectList(CPDF_PageObjects const*, CFX_Matrix const*) core/src/fpdfapi/fpdf_render/fpdf_render.cpp:269:5
#9 0xe6bc26 in CPDF_RenderStatus::ProcessForm(CPDF_FormObject*, CFX_Matrix const*) core/src/fpdfapi/fpdf_render/fpdf_render.cpp:485:3
#10 0xe6704c in CPDF_RenderStatus::ProcessObjectNoClip(CPDF_PageObject const*, CFX_Matrix const*) core/src/fpdfapi/fpdf_render/fpdf_render.cpp:402:14
#11 0xe67f47 in CPDF_RenderStatus::ContinueSingleObject(CPDF_PageObject const*, CFX_Matrix const*, IFX_Pause*) core/src/fpdfapi/fpdf_render/fpdf_render.cpp:330:3
#12 0xe76f12 in CPDF_ProgressiveRenderer::Continue(IFX_Pause*) core/src/fpdfapi/fpdf_render/fpdf_render.cpp:1152:13
#13 0xe756c1 in CPDF_ProgressiveRenderer::Start(IFX_Pause*) core/src/fpdfapi/fpdf_render/fpdf_render.cpp:1090:3
#14 0x63dbd7 in FPDF_RenderPage_Retail(CRenderContext*, void*, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, IFSDK_PAUSE_Adapter*) fpdfsdk/src/fpdfview.cpp:752:3
#15 0x63c3af in FPDF_RenderPageBitmap fpdfsdk/src/fpdfview.cpp:507:3
#16 0x4ee0df in RenderPage(std::string const&, void* const&, void* const&, int, Options const&) samples/pdfium_test.cc:374:3
#17 0x4f0af8 in RenderPdf(std::string const&, char const*, unsigned long, Options const&) samples/pdfium_test.cc:531:9
#18 0x4f16e9 in main samples/pdfium_test.cc:608:5
Address 0x7ffc8b7edb84 is located in stack of thread T0 at offset 36 in frame
#0 0xd6e2af in CPDF_StitchFunc::v_Call(float*, float*) const core/src/fpdfapi/fpdf_page/fpdf_page_func.cpp:795
This frame has 2 object(s):
[32, 36) 'input' <== Memory access at offset 36 overflows this variable
[48, 52) 'nresults'
HINT: this may be a false positive if your program uses some custom stack unwind mechanism or swapcontext
(longjmp and C++ exceptions *are* supported)
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow core/src/fpdfapi/fpdf_page/fpdf_page_func.cpp:896:9 in CPDF_Function::Call(float*, int, float*, int&) const
Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
0x1000116f5b20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x1000116f5b30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x1000116f5b40: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x1000116f5b50: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x1000116f5b60: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1
=>0x1000116f5b70:[04]f2 04 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x1000116f5b80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x1000116f5b90: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x1000116f5ba0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x1000116f5bb0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x1000116f5bc0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
Addressable: 00
Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
Heap left redzone: fa
Heap right redzone:fb
Freed heap region: fd
Stack left redzone:f1
Stack mid redzone: f2
Stack right redzone: f3
Stack partial redzone: f4
Stack after return:f5
Stack use after scope: f8
Global redzone:f9
Global init order: f6
Poisoned by user:f7
Container overflow:fc
Array cookie:ac
Intra object redzone:bb
ASan internal: fe
Left alloca redzone: ca
Right alloca redzone:cb
==22207==ABORTING
--- cut ---
While the sample crashes on a memory read operation in AddressSanitizer, an out-of-bounds "write" takes place subsequently in the same method, leading to a stack-based buffer overflow condition.
The crash was reported at https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=551460. Attached is the PDF file which triggers the crash.
Proof of Concept:
https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb-bin-sploits/-/raw/main/bin-sploits/39165.zip
体验盒子
